keychain give away is in appreciation for all the support for the channel
we love comments
best /funniest /rude and inciteful comments all apply lol....
picks will be pinned and winner will be notified by me by reply to pin, winner wicked in 7 DAYS or less. contact email is [email protected]
Suspended
CC
English Video
1010
11:52:49
Info
Description Meeting No. 124 SECU - Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security
Location Wellington Building - 415
Scheduled
Friday, Oct 18, 2024
09:20 - 11:00
1 Hour 39 Minutes
Actual https://parlvu.parl.gc.ca/Harmony/en/...
Friday, Oct 18, 2024
09:20
Contact
Information
[email protected]
Information website

Title: Unveiling the Motion: Canadian Conservatives Advocate for Transparency in Parliament

Introduction:

In a recent turn of events, conservative politicians in Canada have ignited a heated discussion within the country's political landscape. A controversial motion has been put forward by the Conservatives, proposing the release of the names of alleged "traitorous" Members of Parliament (MPs) irrespective of their political affiliation. This bold move has raised questions about transparency, accountability, and the potential consequences in a democratic system.

Background:

The motion, advanced by conservative politicians in Canada, aims to bring greater transparency to the parliamentary system by exposing the identities of MPs who are perceived as "traitors" to their party or the nation. The proposal marks a departure from traditional norms and parliamentary procedures, stirring significant controversy and debate.

Justification for the Motion:

Supporters of this motion argue that citizens have the right to know whether their elected representatives are acting in accordance with the principles of their respective parties and the best interests of the country. They contend that revealing the names of alleged "traitorous" members would foster accountability and help maintain the integrity of democracy.

Transparency and Accountability:

Proponents of the motion contend that exposing the names of "traitors" will discourage politicians from engaging in disloyal acts, such as betraying party positions, collaborating with opposition parties against their own, or leaking sensitive information. By publicly disclosing this information, the intention is to deter undesirable behaviors, promote party loyalty, and strengthen accountability within the parliamentary process.

Potential Consequences:

Despite the arguments put forth by supporters, opponents assert that such a motion may have adverse effects on the functioning of Parliament. Critics argue that labeling elected officials as "traitors" may lead to increased polarization in the political arena, fueling animosity and impeding the spirit of collaboration. Moreover, they contend that this motion could potentially compromise the standing of politicians unjustly, undermine their reputations, and erode public trust in the democratic process.

Balancing Transparency with Privacy:

While transparency and accountability are fundamental to any democratic society, the Canadian political landscape must also consider the importance of individual privacy, the need for robust debate, and the potential impact the motion could have on political discourse. Striking the right balance between these aspects is essential to preserve the integrity of the parliamentary system.

Conclusion:

The motion proposed by the conservative politicians in Canada to release the names of allegedly "traitorous" members of Parliament, regardless of political affiliation, has ignited a fierce debate within the country. As the discussion unfolds, it underscores the need for an inclusive dialogue on how to enhance transparency and accountability, while also upholding the principles of privacy and fostering a healthy democratic process. The outcome of this motion will undoubtedly shape the future of political debate and decision-making in Canada.

Described in Section 29 of the Copyright Act of Canada, Fair Dealing permits the limited use of copyright protected material without the risk of infringement and without having to seek the permission of copyright owners. It is intended to provide a balance between the rights of creators and the rights of users.