30 years of flawed nutritional science. What will it take for change to be accepted?
Dr Michael Eades

From my experience as an author, clinician and long-term nutritional blogger, I will present my beliefs of what it will take to change from our current model of flawed research to one in which we in future accept only the evidence from high quality research studies.


Links to articles mentioned in this video:

The Expensive Tissue Hypothesis
Aiello & Wheeler Current Anthropology (1995) 36(2): 199-221
https://courses.edx.org/c4x/Wellesley...
Body Size and Metabolic Rate
http://www.planta.cn/forum/files_plan...
Gough’s Cave Adult Cranium
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/...
Cassidy CM (1980) Nutrition and Health in Agriculturalists and Hunter-Gatherers: A Case Study of Two Populations. Nutritional Anthropology, Redgrave Publishing Co. 117-145.
https://sites.google.com/site/thebepr...
Bruetsch W. (1959)The Earliest Record of Sudden Death Possibly Due to Atherosclerotic Coronary Occlusion.Circulation 20: 438-441
http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/2...
Thompson RC et all (2013) Atherosclerosis across 4000 years of human history. Lancet 381: 1211-1222
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lan...
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lan...
Touzeau a et al (2014) Diet of ancient Egyptians inferred from stable isotope systematics. Journal of Archaeological Science 46:114-124
http://www.academia.edu/6578456/Diet_...