Is legal representation in the U.S. only for the rich and corporations? That's a question that we'll explore in this episode of Stanford Legal with guests David and Nora Freeman Engstrom, two leading authorities on access to justice and the legal profession. They'll explain the roots of the challenge, how unauthorized practice of law rules contribute to the problem, and how to address them. The Engstroms co-direct Stanford Law School's Deborah L. Rhode Center on the Legal Profession, an academic center working to shape the future of legal services and access to the legal system. This episode delves into some alarming statistics, including the fact that in three-quarters of civil cases in state courts, at least one party is without a lawyer. This alone often leads to unjust outcomes in cases involving debt collection, evictions, family law, and other areas. And that is just part of the problem, as the Engstroms explain.   


Connect:

• Episode Transcripts ＞＞＞ Stanford Legal Podcast Website (https://law.stanford.edu/stanford-leg...)
• Stanford Legal Podcast ＞＞＞ LinkedIn Page (  / stanfordlegal  )
• Rich Ford ＞＞＞  Twitter/X (  / our_ford  )
• Pam Karlan ＞＞＞ Stanford Law School Page (https://law.stanford.edu/pamela-s-kar...)
• Stanford Law School ＞＞＞ Twitter/X (  / stanfordlaw  )
• Stanford  Law Magazine ＞＞＞ Twitter/X (  / @stanfordlawmag  )

Links:

• Nora Freeman Engstrom ＞＞＞ Stanford Law School Page (https://law.stanford.edu/nora-freeman...)
• David Freeman Engstrom ＞＞＞ Stanford Law School Page (https://law.stanford.edu/david-freema...)

Chapter 1: The Access to Justice Crisis in the U.S.
(00:00:00) Pam Karlan introduces the episode, discussing the work of David and Nora Freeman Engstrom at Stanford Law School's Deborah Rhode Center on the Legal Profession. This section provides an overview of the access to justice crisis, highlighting the high percentage of cases where individuals lack legal representation and a look at the types of cases predominantly at issue, including debt collection, evictions, mortgage foreclosures, and family law cases.


Chapter 2: Understanding the Consequences and Causes of Legal Inaccessibility
(00:7:06)  David and Nora Freeman Engstrom explore the broader implications of the lack of legal representation, including the cascade of related legal and financial issues that arise from initial problems like wage garnishment and eviction. They also touch on the hidden legal issues that never make it to court due to individuals' inability to seek legal help.


Chapter 3: Exploring Solutions and Technological Impacts on Access to Justice
(00:10:07) David and Nora Freeman Engstrom  delve into potential solutions to the access to justice crisis, including the role of technology in both exacerbating and potentially alleviating the problem. They discuss the efficiency of technological tools used by the debt collection industry and the implications for legal access.


Chapter 4: The Technology Asymmetry in Debt Collection
(00:14:19 )  Pam Karlan and David Freeman Engstrom discuss how debt collectors use automation to exploit legal processes against unrepresented individuals. They highlight the stark disparity between technological access for debt collectors and individual defendants. Engstrom points out the restrictive rules that limit software-driven legal services, exacerbating the access to justice crisis.


Chapter 5: The Historical Context and Current Restrictions on Legal Services
(00:15:55)  Nora Freeman Engstrom delves into the history of legal service restrictions in the U.S., contrasting it with medical professions. She introduces her research on auto clubs and their provision of legal services in the early 20th century, showing how organized bar associations shut down these alternatives to preserve their monopoly.


Chapter 6: Modern Innovations and Future Prospects in Legal Services
(00:24:13)  The host and guests discuss recent efforts to relax unauthorized practice of law rules in states like Utah and Arizona. They explore innovative legal service models emerging from these reforms, including tiered services and AI-driven solutions, and their potential to democratize access to legal assistance. The discussion highlights how entities like LegalZoom are now able to hire lawyers and provide more comprehensive services. They also touch on the potential of generative AI to bridge the gap between legal jargon and plain language, making legal assistance more accessible to the public. The chapter concludes with reflections on the promise and challenges of these technological advancements.