The criticism that Erling Haaland has received in his second season at Manchester City has been a bit puzzling. Understandable to a point, considering the big misses he has had - uncharacteristic misses it should be said - but greatly overblown as well.

Plenty of focus has been put on his lack of involvement and his lesser yield of goals - but is his output really that bad? And is he just a victim of his own success and people criticizing him for not being something they expect him to be?

FOLLOW ME FOR SHORT-FORM CONTENT:
  / rtvshorts  
  / rabonatv  

SOURCES:

https://www.statmuse.com/fc/ask/erlin...
https://fbref.com/en/players/1f44ac21...
https://www.fotmob.com/topnews/12120-...
   • Erling Haaland admits "playing 60-70 ...  

Heavy criticism: 00:00
Season vs season: 01:18
Funny myths: 04:04
The ‘GOAT’ obsession: 06:53
Thoughts?: 10:30